CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9] — Page 124

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

120

the direction given

Should

officers appointed in ther in 1876 that future

4/2 antiremit at the market rate,

not be entitled to

And we might say

with reference to

Sir S. Bowen's remarks in parag. Hr, that the remark phrase "Entering the

service of Haughing

that despatch

was certainly intended to include all who were transferred from any

such a Colony))

other Colony,

Even

from

Mauritius where exceptional privileges of remittance exist; but that in his

case and that

consisted in our

our

our

of any

only inadvertence (if an having overlooked that

despatch in replying

Early

Sin d. 'P. H. the privilege

to 10387, which

Aregard belok kad toddle

unpression in the Easter

There was an

Department that fir S. Bowen had been told verbally that he would not have

this privilege to

any

In

case he could only remit half his salary, exclusive of the Entertainment Allowance (which in clearly to be spent in the Colony) so

that the exact loss would at 6 in Every dollar (the difference between 3/8 & 4/2)

to be 12,000 × 6 = 6000s. =

Du

and not between £400.

£300;

•£500 (see note on p. 16).

he ma, reply to

is that in Mauritiu there there is no

Vertainment llowance separati on the salary The av allowed to

Wat dala

? Reply that in consideration of his statement that he understood, when he accepted his present appoint-

ment, that he would have this privilege, Lord Derby will continue to allow it to him, but explain with reference to the calculation made in the red

ink note to parag. 7, that the terms of hard the desp. on 10387 phow that it was not intended that the Governor shouldremit more than half of his salary, exclusive thy Entertainment allowance; that that future fovernors dare not to have the privilege continued to

them.

[This must be noted in appointing

quit half of tin future fovernors, and what should be

said in reply to parag. 6?]

hole salary

spected in accepty

long not to love sthing; but I

not dee

GMD.4 Oct

That

why Sir R. Huber

are should get more

ain was

given to predecessor in ngthing.5.4.2.

I was under the impression Ima

bi &. Baren had been named that He

would not be allend. Fremin have

anymore

the nording

destimit reelection (& fran

y the days

on 2822 Impperigee have not, "We munt admits the claim.

Edit History

2026-05-23 14:57:37 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
120 the direction given Should officers appointed in ther in 1876 that future 4/2 antiremit at the market rate, not be entitled to And we might say with reference to Sir S. Bowen's remarks in parag. Hr, that the remark phrase "Entering the service of Haughing that despatch was certainly intended to include all who were transferred from any such a Colony)) other Colony, Even from Mauritius where exceptional privileges of remittance exist; but that in his case and that consisted in our our our of any only inadvertence (if an having overlooked that despatch in replying Early Sin d. 'P. H. the privilege to 10387, which Aregard belok kad toddle unpression in the Easter There was an Department that fir S. Bowen had been told verbally that he would not have this privilege to any In case he could only remit half his salary, exclusive of the Entertainment Allowance (which in clearly to be spent in the Colony) so that the exact loss would at 6 in Every dollar (the difference between 3/8 & 4/2) to be 12,000 × 6 = 6000s. = Du and not between £400. £300; •£500 (see note on p. 16). he ma, reply to is that in Mauritiu there there is no Vertainment llowance separati on the salary The av allowed to Wat dala ? Reply that in consideration of his statement that he understood, when he accepted his present appoint- ment, that he would have this privilege, Lord Derby will continue to allow it to him, but explain with reference to the calculation made in the red ink note to parag. 7, that the terms of hard the desp. on 10387 phow that it was not intended that the Governor shouldremit more than half of his salary, exclusive thy Entertainment allowance; that that future fovernors dare not to have the privilege continued to them. [This must be noted in appointing quit half of tin future fovernors, and what should be said in reply to parag. 6?] hole salary spected in accepty long not to love sthing; but I not dee GMD.4 Oct That why Sir R. Huber are should get more ain was given to predecessor in ngthing.5.4.2. I was under the impression Ima bi &. Baren had been named that He would not be allend. Fremin have anymore the nording destimit reelection (& fran y the days on 2822 Impperigee have not, "We munt admits the claim.
Baseline (Original)
120 the direction given Should officers appointed in ther in 1876 that future 4/2 antiremit at the market rate, not be entitled to And we might say with reference to Sir S. Bowen's remarks in parag. Hr, that the remark phrase "Entering the service of Haughing that despatch was certainly intended to include all who were transferred from any such a Colony)) other Colony, Even from Mauritius where exceptional privileges of remittance exist; but that in his case and that consisted in our our our of any only madvertence (if an having overlooked that despatch in replying Sarly Sin d. 'P. H. the privilege to 10387, which Aregard belok kad toddle unpression in the Easter There was an Department that fir S. Bowen had been told verbally that he would not have this privilege to any In case he could only remit half his salary, exclusive of the Entertainment Allowance (which in clearly to be spent in the (olony) so that the exact loss would at 6 in Every dollar (the difference between 3/8 4 4/2) to be 12,000 × 6 = 6000s. = Du and not between £400. £300; •£500 (see note on p. 16). he ma, reply to is that in Mauritiu there there is no Vertainment llowance separati on the salary The av allowed to Wat dala ? Reply that in consideration of his statement that he understood, when he accepted his present appoint- ment, that he would have this privilege, Lord Derby will continue to allow it to him, but explain with reference to the calculation made in the red ink note to parag. 7, that the terms of hard the desp. on 10387 phow that it was not intended that the Governor shouldremit more than half of his salary, exclusive thy Entertainment allowance; that that future fovernors dare not to have the privilege continued to them. [This must be noted in appointing quit half of tin future fovernors, and what should be said in reply to parag. 6?] hole salary spected in accepty long not to love sthing; but I not dee GMD.4 Oct That why Sir R. Huber are should get more ain was given to predecessor in ngthing.5.4.2. I was under the impression Ima bi &. Baren had been named that He would not be allend. Fremin have вир поврзи anymore the nording destimit reelection (& fran y the days on 2822 Impperigee have not, "We munt admits the claim.
2026-05-23 14:57:37 · Baseline
View content

120

the direction given

Should

officers appointed in ther in 1876 that future

4/2 antiremit at the market rate,

not be entitled to

And we might say

with reference to

Sir S. Bowen's remarks in parag. Hr, that the remark phrase "Entering the

service of Haughing

that despatch

was certainly intended to include all who were transferred from any

such a Colony))

other Colony,

Even

from

Mauritius where exceptional privileges of remittance exist; but that in his

case and that

consisted in our

our

our

of any

only madvertence (if an having overlooked that

despatch in replying

Sarly

Sin d. 'P. H. the privilege

to 10387, which

Aregard belok kad toddle

unpression in the Easter

There was an

Department that fir S. Bowen had been told verbally that he would not have

this privilege to

any

In

case he could only remit half his salary, exclusive of the Entertainment Allowance (which in clearly to be spent in the (olony) so

that the exact loss would at 6 in Every dollar (the difference between 3/8 4 4/2)

to be 12,000 × 6 = 6000s. =

Du

and not between £400.

£300;

•£500 (see note on p. 16).

he ma, reply to

is that in Mauritiu there there is no

Vertainment llowance separati on the salary The av allowed to

Wat dala

? Reply that in consideration of his statement that he understood, when he accepted his present appoint- ment, that he would have this privilege, Lord Derby will continue to allow it to him, but explain with reference to the calculation made in the red

ink note to parag. 7, that the terms of hard the desp. on 10387 phow that it was not intended that the Governor shouldremit more than half of his salary, exclusive thy Entertainment allowance; that that future fovernors dare not to have the privilege continued to

them.

[This must be noted in appointing

quit half of tin future fovernors, and what should be

said in reply to parag. 6?]

hole salary

spected in accepty

long not to love sthing; but I

not dee

GMD.4 Oct

That

why Sir R. Huber

are should get more

ain was

given to predecessor in ngthing.5.4.2.

I was under the impression Ima

bi &. Baren had been named that He

would not be allend. Fremin have вир поврзи

anymore

the nording

destimit reelection (& fran

y the days

on 2822 Impperigee have not, "We munt admits the claim.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.